Friday, February 12, 2010

Movie Review: Percy Jacskson and the Lightning Thief



I used to spend hours in the library reading books about Greek and Roman mythology. It was like a soap opera about tall, magical creatures.  I'd still spend hours in Ateneo's library if I had a student i.d. but that's another story. My love for the gods and their wacky, overl-dramatic stories may be why I enjoyed Percy Jackson and the Lightning thief, given its many flaws.

The movie, based on the book by Rick Riordan, does not waste any time. The adventure immediately rolls out in front of us as a giant Poseidon rises from the ocean to meet with Zeus. Zeus's most powerful weapon, a lightning bolt has been stolen. And he thinks it's Poseidon's demigod son, Percy, who stole the lightning. Why he thinks this is so, I have no idea. Then we're off to an adventure within an adventure within an adventure. 

Percy has to go to Olympus and convince Zeus that he didn't steal the bolt.To do that, he must first train in Camp Half Blood, sort of like Harry Potter's Hogwarts, but with swords. After a half-day of training, he defeats the daughter of Athena, who's been training all her life. It defies logic but another adventure is soon upon us. His mother gets kidnapped by Hades so he has to go to hell and bring her back. But now, our Percy needs to collect 3 pearls which would help them get away from Hades once they're in hell. And so he meets Medusa, the hydra and visits the land of the lotus people. And Percy is so busy he doesn't even have time to grieve for his mother whom he thought was dead. (Maybe he got a peek at the script and knew she was alive anyway.) We don't even have enough time to really get to know Percy or his other friends and they end up flat.

And soon we reach the end and the movie feels less epic than its trailer. This could be because of their attempt to give the characters, the gods in particular, a modern twist, perhaps to make them more relatable, or to help kids easily identify ancient greek mythological creatures. The movie has literally shrunk the gods and thus made them a tad mediocre.

But still I enjoyed watching Percy, it's like playing a video game.

I give Percy a C+

Movie Review:Valentine's Day


The huge cast alone was enough to draw me into the movie house and force me to overcome my dislike for valentine's day - the holiday, not the movie . Valentine's Day, a movie about different people's experience of love stars Julia Roberts, Eric Dane, Jennifer Garner, Ashton Kutcher, Patrick Dempsey, Emma Roberts, Taylor Swift, Taylor Lautner, George Lopez and Jessica Biel. The fun is in spotting the stars. Oh look there's the cute country singer with the buff wolf in that vampire movie. Oooohhh Pretty Woman. But that's where the fun ends for me.

Valentine's Day reminds me of Love Actually, actually. Both movies show how people experience holidays in different ways and how our lives are interconnected. In Valentine's Day the central figure that frames and holds this movie together is a flower shop. Here we see the staff with their own love stories to tell and how they are inevitably involved in the lives of their customers. We get to see love in varying degrees - romantic, maternal, homosexual, puppy, teenage. And of course there are the bitter stories of love, those that speak of being alone on the day of hearts, those that end in, well, endings. But somehow everything turns out all right for most of the characters. 

My problem with this movie though, besides the cliched montage of stories and characters, is the lack of oomph, of pizzaz, of thrill. Sure the movie tries to surprise us with several ooohh-I-didn't-see-that-coming endings, but there's really nothing original about the stories or the characters. They're mostly caricatures of valentine stereotypes. And because we know them so well already, we know where their stories end. The difference between  Love Actually and Valentines Day is that I still remember the former, years after and I'm sure to forget the latter like some dust-covered valentine gift that's not even good enough to be recycled.

As for performances, Anne Hathaway shines best here for me. 

I give Valentines Day a C+

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Hearts all over the world


HEARTS ALL OVER THE WORLD! ♥ ♥ ♥ 

Write a message of inspiration, hope and concern to children who have been victims of abuse. In this season of love, BE A KID'S SPECIAL VALENTINE and make them feel lalalaLOVE!

Visit Tugon at SEC-C FOYER ALL WEEK!!

Also, be sure to watch our benefit play, Blue Rep's BREAKUPS & BREAKDOWNS this THURSDAY, FEB 11, 2010. :) All proceeds will go to the benefit of Tugon's partner institutions. Tickets priced at Php 150 :) Drop by at our booth for tickets. :)\

See you all!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Monday, February 8, 2010

i love you


Taken a couple of years back, these are kids from welcome home foundation, school for the deaf, in bukidnon. Here they're doing the i love you sign, if i'm not wrong.

uy

i miss you. .gd

Friday, February 5, 2010

Anne Hathaway on GQ

Actress Anne Hathaway is on the cover of British GQ. Haaaaay.

Conflict of interest

Last week Winnie Monsod wrote a brief but fact-based analysis of the C-5 issue. Manny, along with his hordes, defended himself by saying that the C5 extension was not redundant but necessary. I'm not going to go into the nitty-gritty of the issue. 2 facts stand high-lighted before me:

1. The C-5 project, according to DPWH reports, was conceptualized and initially funded by Manny Villar.
2. The C-5 project dubiously benefits the properties of Villar. 

Conflict of interest, plain and simple. If you use government money and power for personal gain, then you are corrupt. Plain and simple.  Should we ask, who is the main beneficiary of teh c-5 project? Plain and simple. Again, this is why Manny Villar is not my president.

Oh and here is Winnie Monsod's follow up to her previous article.

Refuting Manny’s defenders 

By Solita Collas-Monsod
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 22:33:00 02/05/2010

Filed Under: Elections, Graft & Corruption, Manny Villar

IN RESPONSE TO LAST WEEK’S COLUMN where I presented some incontrovertible facts regarding the ethics case against Sen. Manny Villar, I received an e-mail from one Danilo Suarez of Quezon City. He wrote: “Read your column re your take on C5 and Sen. Villar’s ‘involvement.’ In the interest of fairness, I exhort you, as a supporter of Sen. Villar, to also check his official website and his side on the matter. I trust you would put this out as you search for the truth …. Looking forward to reading about it in your column.”

My reply: “Dear Mr. Suarez, If there is anything erroneous in any of the statements of fact that were published in my column, please feel free to point them out, together with the documents you have that will allow me to verify that they are indeed erroneous. As you may have noticed, the A’s in my column can be verified by documents and uncontroverted statements from official sources, which I was very careful to cite, precisely so that readers like you can check them. I am certainly glad that Mr. Villar has aired his side on his website. That is his choice. It is mine to look at the government documents and the sworn testimony that are part of the Senate record. I look forward to Mr. Villar’s defending himself in a venue that allows for clarificatory questions and refutations. That is, after all, part and parcel of transparency and accountability that are so necessary for good governance. Regards.”

The Inquirer also forwarded me an e-mail from Ma. Nalen Rosero-Galang, who identifies herself as legal counsel for Senator Villar. I also received a paper titled “C-5 sound and fury: Is Monsod painting the full picture? Student rebukes professor” by Ricardo G. Barcelona of Spain, who identifies himself firstly as “a former student of Prof. Monsod,” before going on to reciting the rest of his impressive curriculum vitae. I am honored that he considers his being my former student (albeit a rebuking one) more important than the rest of his professional achievements.

For the most part, both Galang and Barcelona do not contest the facts presented in last week’s column. An exception is when Galang asserts that “There is no evidence whatsoever that the alignment of the C5 Road Extension was determined by Senator Villar, or that its alignment was changed in order that it should pass through the real estate properties of Senator Villar’s companies.” Excuse me, Ms Galang: May I remind you that per the Department of Public Works and Highways, Senator Villar conceptualized and initially funded both the CX-5 and the Las Piñas-Parañaque Link Road project. That is in black and white in the DPWH project feasibility studies.

Both do contest what I considered a reasonable conclusion: that since there was already an ongoing (MCTEP) linking C-5 to the Coastal Road, it was unnecessary (and therefore wasteful) to build a second one. Galang argues that both were necessary, given the “worsening traffic condition (sic) in Parañaque, Las Piñas and Cavite.” Barcelona argues that it was not a case of wastefulness, but rather of creating choices for motorists.

To Ms Galang: where in urban Philippines are traffic conditions not worsening? To Mr. Barcelona: MCTEP was conceived precisely to create choices for motorists. There already exists a current road network, toll-free, that will allow motorists to move from SLEX to the Coastal Road. MCTEP would give them the choice of going from point A to Point B more quickly—as long as they are willing to pay for the convenience. Giving motorists a third choice, in the context of competing demands on scarce resources, cannot be—never mind, should not be—defended. Giving motorists a third choice, while at the same time ensuring that the third-choice road passes through Villar-owned properties (I notice neither Galang nor Barcelona refuted the 50-52 hectare area involved), is even less defensible.

Then there is the matter of zonal valuation. Barcelona is correct to point out a seemingly inconsistent set of estimates: In my column, I stated (not suggested—it is a matter of arithmetic), that the Villar lots were acquired at an average price of P7,168/sq m while non-Villar properties went for P1,880/sq m. In my analysis for News on Q, which was earlier taped, the figures I gave were P11,520 and P2,922 respectively (not the P11,000 and P4,500 that Barcelona cites. Tsk.). Inconsistent? No. The P11,520 figure refers only to the properties that are directly Villar-owned. The P7,168 figure refers to direct properties and those in joint-venture with Villar companies. Please note that I used the lower figures in my column.

To Barcelona: Do not put words in my mouth. I was not suggesting that capital gains linked to proximity to public works should accrue to government. And there is a world of difference between the Hacienda Luisita issue and the Villar properties issue: (1) Noynoy Aquino probably owns less than 2 percent of Luisita, Villar owns 100 percent of his properties; and (2) Villar conceived and initially funded CX-5/LPPLP; Aquino had zilch to do with SCTEX. Tsk.

Moral of the story: Do not rebuke your teacher using insinuations and without full knowledge of the facts. My fault is that I didn’t teach him any better.

Finally, I cannot resist quoting Joker Arroyo, circa 1998: “So in the case of Speaker Villar, it is simple. If he wants to go/continue in business and deal with government financial institutions, he can do so but he cannot also be a congressman. If he wants to be a congressman, then he must not be in business which deals with the government. We have to pay a price.” Amen.

"All is fair in love and politics."

Not so if you spend so much more than you can actually afford that you bury yourself in politcal debt, a debt which you'll have to pay later on with the people's money. 

One of the many reasons why I am NOT voting for the guy in orange is because of his utter aggressiveness in campaigning. How much has he spent? Experts estimate he has spent around 3 billion pesos on ads alone. I've visited several municipalities in the past few months and Villar has his face plastered everywhere, months before the actual campaign period. 

He has such hunger for the presidency that it frightens me. It frightens me because it reminds me of a certain president. The one who promised on Rizal's shrine that she won't run for another term and 6 years later is still president. The one who will run for congress to stay in power. I can't help but imagine what anyone with such hunger for power would do to remain in power, regardless if everyone else swims in their own garbage.

From here:

Villar money rules noontime TV shows 

By Nikko Dizon
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 01:21:00 02/06/2010

Filed Under: Politics, Elections, Eleksyon 2010

AS EARLY AS 3 A.M. last Thursday, 46-year-old balut vendor Josie Magtangub and her daughter were lining up for the popular noontime show “Eat Bulaga” at Broadway Centrum in Quezon City.

Magtangub said she wanted to win P25,000 in cash given in the segment “Stop My Hirap” to help her sustain her small business and send her 8-year-old child to school.

“I was told the lines were long so I came early,” she told the Inquirer in Filipino.

The 10-hour wait was worth it. Shortly past noon, Magtangub and her daughter were on stage with hosts Michael V. and Ruby Rodriguez, jumping up and down while orange and white confetti rained on them.

Magtangub won P25,000 and P10,000 worth of groceries courtesy of Nacionalista Party (NP) standard-bearer, Sen. Manuel Villar, who sponsors “Stop My Hirap.”

While signing up celebrity endorsers has always been a norm in election campaigns, a game show segment—never mind if it’s aired for less than 5 minutes—is a trailblazing campaign strategy.

As if his television and radio advertisements were not enough, Villar has conquered the popular Filipino noontime shows aired on the two biggest networks, winning the hearts and minds of voters. He has maximized all possible campaign platforms, which reflects Villar’s marketing genius that has made him one of the richest Filipinos in the country.

The strategy must have helped Villar’s latest surge in the presidential surveys, putting him neck and neck with Liberal Party standard-bearer and perennial front-runner, Sen. Benigno “Noynoy” Aquino III.

Willie and Michael V

Among Villar’s celebrity endorsers are hosts of noontime shows—Michael V. from “Eat Bulaga” aired on GMA 7 and Willie Revillame of ABS-CBN’s “Wowowee.” The senator was a guest on “Wowowee” when Revillame celebrated his birthday a few weeks ago.

For political analyst Ramon Casiple, Villar’s pre-election campaign spending, was “scandalous” by democratic terms.

Hinged on Villar’s antipoverty advocacy, “Stop My Hirap” aimed right at the gut of the hungry masses as well as the middle class, he said.

Why they joined

For instance, Wilson Ng, 25, and Drid de Castro, 24, who were not exactly poor as they were working in their families’ respective businesses also joined “Stop My Hirap.”

Ng said he wanted to win the cash money so he could share it with his family and friends.

De Castro, for his part, said he would use the money to treat his youngest sister who celebrated her birthday Friday.

Since it started last Jan. 19, some 14 studio contestants have each won the jackpot consisting of P25,000 in cash and P10,000 worth of grocery items. Two others—including an Army private who said she needed money to pay for the medicines of her mother and sibling—won P10,000 each.

The winners were either teachers, overseas Filipino workers, househelp or laborers.

Mechanics

The mechanics of the contest, which ends its two-and-a-half-week run today, or two days before the formal election campaign begins, are simple: Audience members write on orange sheets of paper what they would do if they win P25,000. The pieces of paper go into a fish bowl where the hosts, who are dressed in orange, pick one lucky contestant—but not before egging the audience to dance to an upbeat jingle composed by Michael V. The dance ends with Villar’s signature hand sign where the thumb and forefinger form a check sign just under the chin.

The lucky contestant gets to spin an orange electronic wheel and depending on where the needle stops, the contestant could win P10,000, P15,000 cash, groceries, or the jackpot.

At the end of the segment, the story of a poor, struggling citizen is aired, recalling Villar’s own rags-to-riches tale. The candidate’s image and slogan, “Sipag at Tiyaga” is flashed on screen.

Secret

Malou Choa-Fagar, senior vice president and chief operations officer of TAPE Inc. and producer of “Eat Bulaga” told the Inquirer that “Stop My Hirap” was a “portion buy” on the noontime show by the Villar campaign team.

Fagar, however, declined to say how much the segment cost, saying the information was confidential.

An industry insider told the Inquirer that depending on a segment’s concept, a portion buy such as “Stop My Hirap” could cost from P700,000 to P1 million per episode. The amount did not include the prizes given away and the talent fees of hosts.

A show producer like TAPE could also offer package deals to its clients to lower costs, the source added.

Fagar clarified that TAPE did not look at “Stop My Hirap” as a campaign vehicle.

“To us, [the Villar team] is a client coming into our show,” she said.

First time

Asked if this was a brilliant strategy on Villar’s part, Fagar replied: “I think so; it is the first time something like this was placed within a show. Usually, spots [or political advertisements] are aired outside the shows.”

Casiple, executive director of the Institute of Political and Electoral Reform (IPER), said Villar’s “Stop My Hirap” was an interesting “development” in campaign strategy.

Villar, whose net worth reportedly totals P25 billion according to Forbes Magazine, had changed the political landscape with “that level of spending.”

“He’s spending around ten times as much as his nearest rival,” Casiple said, referring to Aquino.

Casiple described Villar’s campaign expenses as nearly “scandalous.”

“By democratic rules, everybody but everybody is qualified to run but with Villar’s spending, it shows that only those with money can run. But should we allow money to rule?” he said.

“All is fair in love and politics,” Casiple concluded.